From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2. From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20070423104534.51bac974.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070423141123.GA21174@skybase> <20070423104534.51bac974.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 13:21:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1178709710.30649.37.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mb@bu3sch.de, linville@tuxdriver.com, arnd@arndb.de, maxextreme@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de List-ID: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the > > git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will > > be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390. > > The code does compile but without hardware it is mute to have the > > config options. I'll wait until the git-wireless.patch is upstream. > > Patches 7-9 depend on patches found in -mm. > > > > umm, OK. If it's Ok I think I'll duck it for now: -mm is full. > > Over-full, really: I've been working basically continuously since Friday > getting the current dungpile to compile and boot, and it's still miles away > from that. Is -mm less full now? I've seen you dropped your third patch bomb, so maybe there is room now .. I regenerated the kconfig patches. They fit on top of todays git but they do have some rejects on 2.6.21-mm1. The rejects are trivial to fix, but there are about 10 of them. So when will be a good time to add the Kconfig patches to git390? And do you prefer to let them rot^H^H^Hmature in -mm for a while before they can go upstream? -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.