From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 1/7] taskstats: Add new taskstats command TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_PIDS From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20101111170813.527389224@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20101111170352.732381138@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101111170813.527389224@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:39:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1289677184.2109.171.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Michael Holzheu Cc: Shailabh Nagar , Andrew Morton , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Suresh Siddha , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , John stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Balbir Singh , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Holzheu wrote: > + if (cmd_pids->cnt > 1000) // XXX socket buffer size check What's the implication of this limit? Does that mean that if there's more than 1000 tasks on the system the whole interface falls flat on its face or does that mean we get at most 1000 tasks worth of information per syscall?