From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] taskstats: Add per task steal time accounting From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20101115184206.4463fd05@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20101111170352.732381138@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101111170815.024542355@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1289677083.2109.167.camel@laptop> <20101115155057.15f3be35@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1289833883.2109.494.camel@laptop> <20101115184206.4463fd05@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:47:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1289843229.2109.516.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Michael Holzheu , Shailabh Nagar , Andrew Morton , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Suresh Siddha , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , John stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Balbir Singh , Heiko Carstens , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "jeremy.fitzhardinge" List-ID: On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 18:42 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > There are 40 bytes more in the task structure and a few instructions more > in account_steal_time. I would not call that gazillions wasted bytes and > cycles. Taken over all machines running Linux on real hardware that's gobs of memory wasted and lots of cycles spend adding 0s.