From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH 20/23] s390: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:35:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1311694534-5161-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1311694534-5161-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1311694534-5161-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Tejun Heo , Heiko Carstens , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-ID: s390 used early_node_map[] just to prime free_area_init_nodes(). Now memblock can be used for the same purpose and early_node_map[] is scheduled to be dropped. Use memblock instead. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org --- Only compile tested. arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig index c03fef7..e0c3929 100644 --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ config S390 select HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if !MARCH_G5 select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP + select HAVE_MEMBLOCK + select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP + select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c index 0c35dee..5b4e48a 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -596,7 +597,8 @@ setup_memory(void) end_chunk = min(end_chunk, end_pfn); if (start_chunk >= end_chunk) continue; - add_active_range(0, start_chunk, end_chunk); + memblock_add_node(PFN_PHYS(start_chunk), + PFN_PHYS(end_chunk - start_chunk), 0); pfn = max(start_chunk, start_pfn); for (; pfn < end_chunk; pfn++) page_set_storage_key(PFN_PHYS(pfn), -- 1.7.6