From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Wanlong Gao Subject: [PATCH 5/5] s390:block:fix up ENOIOCTLCMD error handling Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:23:16 +0800 Message-Id: <1346052196-32682-6-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1346052196-32682-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1346052196-32682-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wanlong Gao , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux390@de.ibm.com, "open list:S390" List-ID: At commit 07d106d0, Linus pointed out that ENOIOCTLCMD should be translated as ENOTTY to user mode. Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org (open list:S390) Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao --- drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c index cceae70..809a89b 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ int dasd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, if (base->discipline->ioctl) { rc = base->discipline->ioctl(block, cmd, argp); if (rc == -ENOIOCTLCMD) - rc = -EINVAL; + rc = -ENOTTY; } else rc = -EINVAL; } -- 1.7.12