From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1392628578.10966.28.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: remove HAVE_MARCH_Z9?0_FEATURES From: Paul Bolle Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:16:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140217091021.GB4651@osiris> References: <1392570927.28866.12.camel@x220> <20140217082035.GA4651@osiris> <1392627040.10966.18.camel@x220> <20140217091021.GB4651@osiris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 10:10 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:50:40AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Completeness of what? > > Each cpu generation we support is supposed to have a > "HAVE_MARCH__FEATURES" config symbol. But apparently these two generations can do fine without it. > > Anyhow, perhaps you can comment this stuff out if you want to have it in > > the tree. See, these symbols will pop up each time that people run their > > scripts to discover problems in the kconfig space. I suppose this was > > probably not the first time these two were reported. And people not > > aware of this thread might do that again, and again... > > What script did you use? A local piece of perl. It started rather cute but it has grown quite big now. I never let it leaves its cage. I just push some food between the bars every now and then. Paul Bolle