From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Freimann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 09/11] KVM: s390: add bitmap for handling cpu-local interrupts Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 09:18:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1417421288-sup-219@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1417181139-25623-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1417181139-25623-10-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <5478AE7D.7010805@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <5478AE7D.7010805@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Christian Borntraeger , KVM , Alexander Graf , Cornelia Huck , linux-s390 List-ID: Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of 2014-11-28 18:18:53 +0100: > > On 28/11/2014 14:25, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > +struct kvm_s390_irq_payload { > > + struct kvm_s390_io_info io; > > + struct kvm_s390_ext_info ext; > > + struct kvm_s390_pgm_info pgm; > > + struct kvm_s390_emerg_info emerg; > > + struct kvm_s390_extcall_info extcall; > > + struct kvm_s390_prefix_info prefix; > > + struct kvm_s390_mchk_info mchk; > > +}; > > + > > struct or union? This really should be a struct because we use it to keep payload data for several parallel pending interrupts and don't want to write over other data. Jens > > Paolo