From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:18:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Update kernel math-emu code from current glibc soft-fp
Message-Id: <1435702685.24693.3.camel@ellerman.id.au>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1505192206580.28384@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506221321340.27145@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <1435634913.24866.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506301042250.2339@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506301042250.2339@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sh/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, "David S.Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:48 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> 
> > Is there some way you can imagine of splitting this up into smaller chunks, so
> > that different arches can merge the pieces separately?
> 
> Well, it could be split as:
> 
> 1. Rename include/math-emu to math-emu-old and update architectures for 
> the renaming (mechanically).
> 
> 2. Add new include/math-emu.
> 
> 3,4,5,6,7. Move each architecture from math-emu-old to math-emu.
> 
> 8. Remove math-emu-old.
> 
> You still have patch 1 affecting all five architectures, but with the 
> per-architecture changes being much simpler.

OK. That's obviously a bit more churn, but I think it's probably the best
approach. Unless someone else has a better idea?

cheers