From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:50476 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727551AbgBASxO (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2020 13:53:14 -0500 Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/7] s390x: smp: Fix ecall and emcall report strings References: <20200201152851.82867-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> <20200201152851.82867-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <15009dae-26eb-e6f6-25c6-c1dc9f0ee170@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 19:53:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200201152851.82867-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Janosch Frank , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com On 01/02/2020 16.28, Janosch Frank wrote: > Instead of "smp: ecall: ecall" we now get "smp: ecall: received". > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > --- > s390x/smp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c > index e37eb56..93a9594 100644 > --- a/s390x/smp.c > +++ b/s390x/smp.c > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void ecall(void) > load_psw_mask(mask); > set_flag(1); > while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); } > - report(1, "ecall"); > + report(1, "received"); > set_flag(1); > } > > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void emcall(void) > load_psw_mask(mask); > set_flag(1); > while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); } > - report(1, "ecall"); > + report(1, "received"); > set_flag(1); > } Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth