linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	dominik.dingel@gmail.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: Refactor host cmma and pfmfi interpretation controls
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:43:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518709402-91101-2-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518709402-91101-1-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

use_cmma in kvm_arch means that the vm is allowed to use cmma, whereas
use_cmma in the mm context means it has been used before. Let's rename
the kvm_arch one to has_cmma

Also let's introduce has_pfmfi, so we can remove the pfmfi disablement
when we activate cmma and rather not activate it in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ++-
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 arch/s390/kvm/priv.c             |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index afb0f08..b768754 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -791,7 +791,8 @@ struct kvm_arch{
 	unsigned long mem_limit;
 	int css_support;
 	int use_irqchip;
-	int use_cmma;
+	int has_cmma;
+	int has_pfmfi;
 	int user_cpu_state_ctrl;
 	int user_sigp;
 	int user_stsi;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 4a2d68c..781aaf0 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -655,7 +655,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_mem_control(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *att
 		VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "%s", "ENABLE: CMMA support");
 		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
 		if (!kvm->created_vcpus) {
-			kvm->arch.use_cmma = 1;
+			kvm->arch.has_cmma = 1;
+			/* Not compatible with cmma. */
+			kvm->arch.has_pfmfi = 0;
 			ret = 0;
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
@@ -665,7 +667,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_mem_control(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *att
 		if (!sclp.has_cmma)
 			break;
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-		if (!kvm->arch.use_cmma)
+		if (!kvm->arch.has_cmma)
 			break;
 
 		VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "%s", "RESET: CMMA states");
@@ -810,7 +812,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_start_migration(struct kvm *kvm)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	kvm->arch.migration_state = mgs;
 
-	if (kvm->arch.use_cmma) {
+	if (kvm->arch.has_cmma) {
 		/*
 		 * Get the first slot. They are reverse sorted by base_gfn, so
 		 * the first slot is also the one at the end of the address
@@ -855,7 +857,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_stop_migration(struct kvm *kvm)
 	mgs = kvm->arch.migration_state;
 	kvm->arch.migration_state = NULL;
 
-	if (kvm->arch.use_cmma) {
+	if (kvm->arch.has_cmma) {
 		kvm_s390_sync_request_broadcast(kvm, KVM_REQ_STOP_MIGRATION);
 		/* We have to wait for the essa emulation to finish */
 		synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu);
@@ -1551,7 +1553,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_cmma_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
 	cur = args->start_gfn;
 	i = next = pgstev = 0;
 
-	if (unlikely(!kvm->arch.use_cmma))
+	if (unlikely(!kvm->arch.has_cmma))
 		return -ENXIO;
 	/* Invalid/unsupported flags were specified */
 	if (args->flags & ~KVM_S390_CMMA_PEEK)
@@ -1650,7 +1652,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_cmma_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	mask = args->mask;
 
-	if (!kvm->arch.use_cmma)
+	if (!kvm->arch.has_cmma)
 		return -ENXIO;
 	/* invalid/unsupported flags */
 	if (args->flags != 0)
@@ -2007,6 +2009,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 
 	kvm->arch.css_support = 0;
 	kvm->arch.use_irqchip = 0;
+	kvm->arch.has_pfmfi = sclp.has_pfmfi;
 	kvm->arch.epoch = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
@@ -2045,7 +2048,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm))
 		gmap_remove(vcpu->arch.gmap);
 
-	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_cmma)
+	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.has_cmma)
 		kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma(vcpu);
 	free_page((unsigned long)(vcpu->arch.sie_block));
 
@@ -2431,8 +2434,6 @@ int kvm_s390_vcpu_setup_cmma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.sie_block->cbrlo = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!vcpu->arch.sie_block->cbrlo)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 &= ~ECB2_PFMFI;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2468,7 +2469,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 73))
 		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_TE;
 
-	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8) && sclp.has_pfmfi)
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8) && vcpu->kvm->arch.has_pfmfi)
 		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 |= ECB2_PFMFI;
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 130))
 		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 |= ECB2_IEP;
@@ -2502,7 +2503,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	else
 		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ictl |= ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE;
 
-	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_cmma) {
+	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.has_cmma) {
 		rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_setup_cmma(vcpu);
 		if (rc)
 			return rc;
@@ -3013,7 +3014,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 * Re-enable CMMA virtualization if CMMA is available and
 		 * was used.
 		 */
-		if ((vcpu->kvm->arch.use_cmma) &&
+		if ((vcpu->kvm->arch.has_cmma) &&
 		    (vcpu->kvm->mm->context.use_cmma))
 			vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 |= ECB2_CMMA;
 		goto retry;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index c4c4e15..908b579 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static int handle_essa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "ESSA: release %d pages", entries);
 	gmap = vcpu->arch.gmap;
 	vcpu->stat.instruction_essa++;
-	if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.use_cmma)
+	if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.has_cmma)
 		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
 
 	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-15 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-09  9:34 [RFC/PATCH v3 00/16] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 01/16] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular Janosch Frank
2018-02-13 14:07   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 02/16] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting Janosch Frank
2018-02-13 14:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-13 14:31     ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 03/16] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg Janosch Frank
2018-02-13 14:16   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-13 14:39     ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification Janosch Frank
2018-02-13 14:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-13 14:54     ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-13 14:59       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-13 15:33         ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-14 10:42           ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-14 11:19             ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-14 14:18               ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-14 14:55                 ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-14 15:15                   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-14 15:24                     ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 05/16] s390/mm: Add gmap pmd invalidation and clearing Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 06/16] s390/mm: Add huge page dirty sync support Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 07/16] s390/mm: Make gmap_read_table EDAT1 compatible Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 08/16] s390/mm: Make protect_rmap " Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 09/16] s390/mm: Add shadow segment code Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 10/16] s390/mm: Add VSIE reverse fake case Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 11/16] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 12/16] s390/mm: clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 13/16] s390/mm: Add huge pmd storage key handling Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 14/16] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 15/16] KVM: s390: Add KVM HPAGE capability Janosch Frank
2018-02-09  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 16/16] s390/mm: Add gmap lock classes Janosch Frank
2018-02-14 14:30 ` [RFC/PATCH v3 00/16] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement David Hildenbrand
2018-02-14 15:01   ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-14 15:07     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-14 15:33       ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-14 15:48         ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 15:57           ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-14 15:56         ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 15:43           ` [PATCH 0/3] Hpage capability rework Janosch Frank
2018-02-15 15:43             ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2018-02-15 16:08               ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: Refactor host cmma and pfmfi interpretation controls David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 16:42                 ` Janosch Frank
2018-02-16  9:46                   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 15:43             ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: s390: Add storage key facility interpretation control Janosch Frank
2018-02-15 16:09               ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 20:27               ` Farhan Ali
2018-02-15 15:43             ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support Janosch Frank
2018-02-15 16:10               ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1518709402-91101-2-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dominik.dingel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).