From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE3760BA7; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709199837; cv=none; b=g318xY4zm9Bdo/u4FzOvup3pScm9r+AYNTFVK9QZsQi0XvBXXsR/xJx77i5zqJAfpqJ8I/5FE4T5DpMgw0pYzlUamGp5stul7bIx5u2dwtcbiNQY4qA9hIBxhXCQm4xr1zfBpa//Hg1pPIGBvyJu7EtJlj9Ye0CW/xMYFvVDo1o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709199837; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X/vfymhnan3upoVf726nPIc8SXJCCwv4OsemoA6fj3w=; h=Message-ID:Subject:Date:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=EUVvY5pduYwXPRKBqvoEbJgnLrPHhe3EF0awVWAF2p/sLYEgoytc7obnxJV5YFqa5B2m/Z1DbHSVw/fYP8cFYrxl4z8swxr40hNT4h5J0gBOUgb0xuGTQPz68ARPhvD4wvS2aqP7D+i+yXEO0ecKdzdRwujepuP2daMq+QZWUKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=FL8YFcIk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="FL8YFcIk" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1709199831; h=Message-ID:Subject:Date:From:To; bh=X/vfymhnan3upoVf726nPIc8SXJCCwv4OsemoA6fj3w=; b=FL8YFcIkjtTuVVfANDqDzhAWfgveKdjjP7sD/Xftxg0dCigr1s7Ilblipg9h4GDAXx4nPIhbjPbCpyQGHURQqQy4xMm2g39zTi1Jexp1vovkfacEkxSLcfWqSZFv332WvAsqGg2FKkeJSxvrsRWEB961pHzJbXe2j+NYS4WWB6g= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R171e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046060;MF=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=34;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W1Sa3HZ_1709199828; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W1Sa3HZ_1709199828) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:43:49 +0800 Message-ID: <1709199778.0187387-3-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v3 00/19] virtio: drivers maintain dma info for premapped vq Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:42:58 +0800 From: Xuan Zhuo To: Johannes Berg Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Hans de Goede , =?utf-8?q?IlpoJ=C3=A4rvinen?= , Vadim Pasternak , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Cornelia Huck , Halil Pasic , Eric Farman , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" References: <20240229072044.77388-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <20240229031755-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1709197357.626784-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <20240229043238-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <4825d7812ac06be3322ca4ae74e3650b2b0cd8de.camel@sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <4825d7812ac06be3322ca4ae74e3650b2b0cd8de.camel@sipsolutions.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:41:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 04:34 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > So the patchset is big, I guess it will take a couple of cycles to > > merge gradually. > > Could also do patches 7, 8, and maybe 9 separately first (which seem > reasonable even on their own) and get rid of CC'ing so many people and > lists for future iterations of the rest of the patchset :-) I agree. @Michael How about you? Thanks > > johannes