From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 09:35:47 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2. Message-Id: <20070509093547.55ca7f8c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1178709710.30649.37.camel@localhost> References: <20070423141123.GA21174@skybase> <20070423104534.51bac974.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1178709710.30649.37.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mb@bu3sch.de, linville@tuxdriver.com, arnd@arndb.de, maxextreme@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de List-ID: On Wed, 09 May 2007 13:21:50 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the > > > git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will > > > be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390. > > > The code does compile but without hardware it is mute to have the > > > config options. I'll wait until the git-wireless.patch is upstream. > > > Patches 7-9 depend on patches found in -mm. > > > > > > > umm, OK. If it's Ok I think I'll duck it for now: -mm is full. > > > > Over-full, really: I've been working basically continuously since Friday > > getting the current dungpile to compile and boot, and it's still miles away > > from that. > > Is -mm less full now? I've seen you dropped your third patch bomb, so > maybe there is room now .. Near 500 patches, which is the lowest it's been in years. I do appear to have a few hundred patch-bearing emails saved away though. > I regenerated the kconfig patches. They fit on top of todays git but > they do have some rejects on 2.6.21-mm1. The rejects are trivial to fix, > but there are about 10 of them. > > So when will be a good time to add the Kconfig patches to git390? Go wild. > And do you prefer to let them rot^H^H^Hmature in -mm for a while before > they can go upstream? Your call. I'd be inclined to push them early personally - Kconfig problems tend to be easy to spot and easy to fix and there's ample time to fine tune it.