From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:24:49 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 - s390 vs. md Message-ID: <20070521092449.34a50f2e@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <0C7297FA1D2D244A9C7F6959C0BF1E5201DEA930@azsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20070518073946.716132f4@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <0C7297FA1D2D244A9C7F6959C0BF1E5201DEA930@azsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: "Williams, Dan J" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-s390 List-ID: On Fri, 18 May 2007 09:30:09 -0700, "Williams, Dan J" wrote: > When CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=n async_tx_find_channel takes the form: > ... async_tx_find_channel( ... ) > { > return NULL; > } > > So in the S390 case the entire asynchronous path will be compiled away. Unfortunately, do_async_xor() (and others) is not ifdef'ed and contains dma_map_page(), which led to the compile failure...