From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:48:09 +0200 From: Hans-Joachim Picht Subject: Re: [patch 05/38] s390: hibernation support for s390 Message-ID: <20090610114809.2c96d243@blc4eb509856389.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20090609195903.GB1388@ucw.cz> References: <20090604161847.513682672@de.ibm.com> <20090604161900.659762303@de.ibm.com> <20090608064451.GD1444@ucw.cz> <20090609153402.58e6b841@blc4eb509856389.ibm.com> <20090609195903.GB1388@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Pavel Machek Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Heiko Carstens List-ID: On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:59:03 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > +/* > > > > + * save CPU registers before creating a hibernation image and > > > > before > > > > + * restoring the memory state from it > > > > + */ > > > > +void save_processor_state(void) > > > > +{ > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +/* > > > > + * restore the contents of CPU registers > > > > + */ > > > > +void restore_processor_state(void) > > > > +{ > > > > +} > > > > > > ...and explaining why the functions can be emmpty would be nice. > > > > I integrated the code for this in the assembly backend in the > > swsusp_arch_suspend & swsusp_arch_resume functions. > > I guessed so. Maybe it is worth a comment? Sure ;-)