From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] S390: Add virtio hotplug add support Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:35:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20100825083525.GF2153@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <1282657732-20902-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1282657732-20902-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20100825081630.GE2153@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Alexander Graf Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell , Christian Ehrhardt , Carsten Otte , borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, KVM list List-ID: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:20:03AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 25.08.2010, at 10:16, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:48:51PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> +static void hotplug_devices(struct work_struct *dummy) > >> +{ > >> + unsigned int i; > >> + struct kvm_device_desc *d; > >> + struct device *dev; > >> + > >> + for (i = 0; i < PAGE_SIZE; i += desc_size(d)) { > > > > This should be > > > > for (i = 0; i + desc_size(d) <= PAGE_SIZE; i += desc_size(d)) { > > > > otherwise you might have memory accesses beyond the device page... > > Oh, this is a simple copy&paste from the original search method. > Is d valid in the first part of the loop already? No, you would need to initialize it with kvm_devices if you change the loop.