From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:57:19 +0100 From: Robert Richter Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/3] s390 hw sampling rework on comments as of Feb 14th Message-ID: <20110316135719.GM31407@erda.amd.com> References: <20110216110118.316927092@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110216110118.316927092@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Heinz Graalfs Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" , "oprofile-list@lists.sf.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "borntraeger@de.ibm.com" , "schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" , "heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" List-ID: On 16.02.11 06:01:18, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > here is the second version of the rework for your comments as of February 14th. > > v2: > - oprofile_add_ext_sample.patch > - introduces struct oprofile_sample_parms in include/linux/oprofile.h > - merges oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample() into oprofile_add_ext_sample() > - changes signature of oprofile_add_ext_sample() by using the proposed > structure containing relevant parameters > - changes all references of oprofile_add_ext_sample() > > v1: > - oprofile_merge_init.patch > - merges hwsampler_files.c of arch/s390/oprofile into init.c > > - oprofile_parms_struct.patch > - introduces first version of struct oprofile_sample_parms in various > functions Heinz, I postponed patches #1 and #3 for after the merge window as both change the fastpath which might cause a perfmormance impact. Patch #2 I already applied. -Robert -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center