From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Consolidate CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:55:09 +0200 Message-ID: <201105131855.10195.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1305244212-19183-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1305244212-19183-10-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1305244212-19183-10-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> List-Archive: List-Post: To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Helge Deller , Heiko Carstens , Stephen Rothwell , Chris Metcalf List-ID: On Friday 13 May 2011, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The help text for this config is duplicated across the x86, > parisc, and s390 Kconfig.debug files. Arnd Bergman noted that the > help text was slightly misleading and should be fixed to state > that enabling this option isn't a problem when using pre 4.4 gcc. > > To simplify the rewording, consolidate the text into > lib/Kconfig.debug and modify it there to be more explicit about > when you should say N to this config. > > Also, make the text a bit more generic by stating that this > option enables compile time checks so we can cover architectures > which emit warnings vs. ones which emit errors. The details of > how an architecture decided to implement the checks isn't as > important as the concept of compile time checking of > copy_from_user() calls. > > While we're doing this, remove all the copy_from_user_overflow() > code that's duplicated many times and place it into lib/ so that > any architecture supporting this option can get the function for > free. > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Arjan van de Ven > Cc: Helge Deller > Cc: Heiko Carstens > Cc: Stephen Rothwell > Cc: Chris Metcalf > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd Thanks for following up on this Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann