From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp,
horms@verge.net.au, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:07:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711140754.GD30674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310133738.3508.245.camel@br98xy6r>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
>
> I attached a document where the s390 port is described in more detail.
> Perhaps this helps you to understand what want and what we are doing. If
> not - just delete it :-)
>
Michael,
Thanks for the documentation. I have gone through it quickly and there
are some parts I am still missing.
On x86, after the kernel crash we jump to purgatory code which does the
checksum verification of all the loaded segments and if everything is
fine, it jumps to kdump kernel's entry point and second kernel boots.
On s390, looks like after purgatory, control is going to some other
piece of code (which does IPL?), and that code decides whether to
start kdump kernel or launch stand alone kernel as backup plan?
If yes, is that code whic does the IPL, also loaded in crashkernel memory
as part of kdump kernel? If not, how does kexec-tools come to know
where to jump after doing checksum on loaded kernel?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 17:09 [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 1/9] kdump: Add KEXEC_CRASH_CONTROL_MEMORY_LIMIT Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 2/9] kdump: Add machine_kexec_finish() Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 3/9] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 4/9] kdump: Initialize vmcoreinfo note at startup Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 5/9] kdump: Allow vmcore ELF header to be created in new kernel Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 6/9] kdump: Merge set_vmcore_list_offsets_elf_32/64() Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 7/9] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390 Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 8/9] s390: kdump backend code Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 9/9] kexec-tools: Add s390 kdump support Michael Holzheu
2011-07-05 20:26 ` [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support Vivek Goyal
2011-07-06 9:24 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-07 19:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-08 9:01 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-11 14:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-11 15:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-13 16:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-13 16:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-13 16:59 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-13 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-13 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-14 7:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-14 17:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-14 18:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-15 14:21 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 14:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-15 15:43 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 12:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 14:00 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 14:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 14:44 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 15:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 18:03 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-19 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-20 8:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-20 9:28 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-20 20:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-20 19:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-21 14:58 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-21 21:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-22 9:33 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-25 16:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-26 9:44 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-22 15:26 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-25 18:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-26 9:32 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 13:56 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 14:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 13:57 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-08 13:04 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-11 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-12 17:29 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-08 14:02 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-11 14:07 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-07-11 15:06 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-09 17:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-07-12 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110711140754.GD30674@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox