From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390: Guest support for virtio-ccw. Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:04:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20121030140452.32dfa251@BR9GNB5Z> References: <1351516046-30037-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <20121029191504.0d36a68a@BR9GNB5Z> <88DEC3C5-44B9-498D-9F7F-A0AFAB527235@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <88DEC3C5-44B9-498D-9F7F-A0AFAB527235@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Alexander Graf Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , KVM , linux-s390 , Christian Borntraeger , Carsten Otte , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Sebastian Ott List-ID: On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:33:14 +0100 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 29.10.2012, at 19:15, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:55:21 +0100 > > Alexander Graf wrote: > > > >> > >> On 29.10.2012, at 14:07, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> > >>> Avi, Marcelo, > >>> > >>> I'd like to propose inclusion of the guest support patches for > >>> virtio-ccw into 3.8. > >>> > >>> I'm confident that the host <-> guest interface for virtio-ccw > >>> is fine now, and the patches have been extensively tested by our > >>> internal test team. > >>> > >>> Patch 1 might conceivably be 3.7 material, though I fear it's a > >>> bit late for that. > >> > >> Well, patch 1 without virtio-ccw support is quite useless, right? You wouldn't get any I/O at all. > > > > Yes, but it stops in an obvious way (no devices can be found) and > > not with a strange backchain. > > Hrm. Then it's probably best to actually CC stable as well :) If there aren't any objections, I'll just respin with minor changes and put in a cc:stable.