From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: Base infrastructure for enabling
 capabilities.
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:16:13 +0100
Message-ID: <20121210111613.4cab94c1@BR9GNB5Z>
References: <1354883425-38531-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
	<1354883425-38531-5-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
	<5C533A6B-0742-48CE-A62C-0385D7AB999A@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5C533A6B-0742-48CE-A62C-0385D7AB999A@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:54:45 +0100
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:

> Missing patch description. Otherwise:

"Add base infrastructure for enabling capabilities" would be redundant,
no?

> 
> Acked-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> On 07.12.2012, at 13:30, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> 
> > Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt |  2 +-
> > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c          | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > index 8617339..bba630b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ documentation when it pops into existence).
> > 4.37 KVM_ENABLE_CAP
> > 
> > Capability: KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP
> > -Architectures: ppc
> > +Architectures: ppc, s390
> > Type: vcpu ioctl
> > Parameters: struct kvm_enable_cap (in)
> > Returns: 0 on success; -1 on error
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > index 731ddee..c015f6f 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
> > #endif
> > 	case KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS:
> > 	case KVM_CAP_ONE_REG:
> > +	case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP:
> > 		r = 1;
> > 		break;
> > 	case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
> > @@ -812,6 +813,22 @@ int kvm_s390_vcpu_store_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr)
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > +				     struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
> > +{
> > +	int r;
> > +
> > +	if (cap->flags)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	switch (cap->cap) {
> > +	default:
> > +		r = -EINVAL;
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +	return r;
> > +}
> > +
> > long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > 			 unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > @@ -898,6 +915,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > 			r = 0;
> > 		break;
> > 	}
> > +	case KVM_ENABLE_CAP:
> > +	{
> > +		struct kvm_enable_cap cap;
> > +		r = -EFAULT;
> > +		if (copy_from_user(&cap, argp, sizeof(cap)))
> > +			break;
> > +		r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(vcpu, &cap);
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > 	default:
> > 		r = -ENOTTY;
> > 	}
> > -- 
> > 1.7.12.4
> > 
>