From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:59:23 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT v2 3/8] s390: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure Message-ID: <20140210115923.GF19013@osiris> References: <1391791763-28518-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1391791763-28518-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20140210095020.GB19013@osiris> <52F8B95F.5030401@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52F8B95F.5030401@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Sudeep Holla Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Martin Schwidefsky , "linux390@de.ibm.com" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" List-ID: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:34:55AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 10/02/14 09:50, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > >> - show_cacheinfo(m); > >> } > >> get_online_cpus(); > >> if (cpu_online(n)) { > > > > You can't remove that. It's a user space visible change. > > > Correct, I wanted to add show_cacheinfo back as its user ABI already, missed it. > > Is it ok if I use cpu0 cacheinfo or to be safer as cpu0 can be offline, use > the cacheinfo of the cpu executing this ? Any online cpu would do, as the information is completely symmetrical.