From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390x: Add I/O adapter registration. Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20140226093705.3d111f2f.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> References: <1393349120-18228-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <1393349120-18228-5-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <530DA5D8.6040909@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <530DA5D8.6040909@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, pbonzini@redhat.com, gleb@kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:29:12 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 25/02/14 18:25, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > +int kvm_s390_io_adapter_map(uint32_t id, uint64_t map_addr, bool do_map) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_s390_io_adapter_req req = { > > + .id = id, > > + .type = do_map ? KVM_S390_IO_ADAPTER_MAP : KVM_S390_IO_ADAPTER_UNMAP, > > + .addr = map_addr, > > + }; > > + KVMS390FLICState *flic = s390_get_flic(); > > + struct kvm_device_attr attr; > > Can we use designated initializer for attr, e.g. > struct kvm_device_attr attr = { > .group = KVM_DEV_FLIC_ADAPTER_MODIFY, > .addr = (uint64_t)&req, > } > > > + int r; > > + > > + if (!flic) { > > + return -ENOSYS; > > + } > > + if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING)) { > > + return -ENOSYS; > > + } > > + > > + attr.group = KVM_DEV_FLIC_ADAPTER_MODIFY; > > + attr.addr = (uint64_t)&req; > > and not do it here. That will zero out the other fields of attr. > > Same for the register code. > Hm, yes, I missed that. I'll change it for the next version.