From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 3/6] KVM: s390: Add GISA support Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:19:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20140904141942.GB4206@osiris> References: <20140904105223.336503578@de.ibm.com> <20140904105337.081387456@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140904105337.081387456@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, pbonzini@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de List-ID: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:52:26PM +0200, frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com wrote: > +void kvm_s390_gisa_register_alert(struct kvm *kvm, u32 gisc) > +{ > + int bito = BITS_PER_BYTE * 7 + gisc; > + > + set_bit(bito ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), &kvm->arch.iam); > +} Just a very minor nit: you could also use set_bit_inv() & friends. > +static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rxy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + u32 x2 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x000f); > + u32 base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28; > + u32 disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16) + > + ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xff00) << 4); > + > + return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + > + (x2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[x2] : 0) + (u64)disp2; > +} Not very readable ;) However.. for the RXY instruction format the 20 bit displacement is usually signed and not unsigned like your code seems to treat it.