From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:45:22 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390:ftrace: add save_stack_trace_regs() Message-ID: <20160129144522.GE3896@osiris> References: <86d380d172bba0416aef64448b0e1b6a50fad326.1454044645.git.panand@redhat.com> <20160129085447.GA3896@osiris> <20160129125749.GD3896@osiris> <20160129085936.09458371@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160129085936.09458371@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Pratyush Anand , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Chunyu Hu , open list List-ID: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:59:36AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:57:49 +0100 > Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > Surpringly it wasn't one of my own patches which broke the stack tracer on > > s390, but one from Steven: > > > > 72ac426a5bb0 ("tracing: Clean up stack tracing and fix fentry updates") > > > > Now I only need to figure out why :) > > Try this one? > > 7717c6be699975f6733d278b13b7c4295d73caf6 > tracing: Fix stacktrace skip depth in trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs() > > Or at the very least, merge with Linus's latest and see if something > else doesn't fix it. No, that doesn't fix it (current Linus' master): # uname -a Linux p2345007 4.5.0-rc1-00032-g26cd83670f2f #26 SMP Fri Jan 29 15:39:47 CET 2016 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux # cat stack_max_size 4496 # cat stack_trace Depth Size Location (0 entries) ----- ---- --------