From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:06:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20160131190616.GA15840@lst.de> References: <1454065260.133285.107.camel@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1454065260.133285.107.camel@infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-s390 , Joerg Roedel , KVM , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Stefano Stabellini , Sebastian Ott , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Borntraeger , David Vrabel , Andy Lutomirski , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Linux Virtualization , "David S. Miller" , Martin Schwidefsky List-ID: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:01:00AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > Also, wasn't Christoph looking at making per-device DMA ops more > generic instead of an 'archdata' thing on basically every platform? Or > did I just imagine that part? What I've done for 4.5 is to switch all architectures to use DMA ops. This should make it fairly easy to have a generic dma ops pointer in the devie structure, but I have no need for that yet, and thus no short term plans to do that work myself.