linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
	Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/oprofile: Remove deprecated create_workqueue
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:08:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160617090821.GB5273@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614155609.GG3754@osiris>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:28:23PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    2 -
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/Makefile         |    1 -
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c      | 1178 --------------------------------
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h      |   63 --
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/init.c           |  489 -------------
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/op_counter.h     |   21 -
> > >  6 files changed, 1754 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Could you send the patch for review anyway?
> 
> Yes, of course. I added it below, hope that's ok.
> [I did not yet add your Ack]
> 
> From 74ab0aefe07573358cc6a0c462ddc62ccba4c0cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:40:06 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] s390/oprofile: remove hardware sampler support
> 
> Remove hardware sampler support from oprofile module.
> 
> The oprofile user space utilty has been switched to use the kernel
> perf interface, for which we also provide hardware sampling support.
> 
> In addition the hardware sampling support is also slightly broken: it
> supports only 16 bits for the pid and therefore would generate wrong
> results on machines which have a pid >64k.
> 
> Also the pt_regs structure which was passed to oprofile common code
> cannot necessarily be used to generate sane backtraces, since the
> task(s) in question may run while the samples are fed to oprofile.
> So the result would be more or less random.
> 
> However given that the only user space tools switched to the perf
> interface already four years ago the hardware sampler code seems to be
> unused code, and therefore it should be reasonable to remove it.
> 
> The timer based oprofile support continues to work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    2 -
>  arch/s390/oprofile/Makefile         |    1 -
>  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c      | 1178 -----------------------------------
>  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h      |   63 --
>  arch/s390/oprofile/init.c           |  489 ---------------
>  arch/s390/oprofile/op_counter.h     |   21 -
>  6 files changed, 1754 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h
>  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/oprofile/op_counter.h
> 

Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-07 21:59 [PATCH] s390/oprofile: Remove deprecated create_workqueue Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-06-07 23:29 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-09  9:00 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-13 16:29   ` Robert Richter
2016-06-13 20:44     ` William Cohen
2016-06-14  5:36     ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-14 13:28       ` Robert Richter
2016-06-14 15:56         ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-17  9:08           ` Hendrik Brueckner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160617090821.GB5273@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhaktipriya96@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).