From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] s390: ensure that syscall arguments are properly masked on s390 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:51:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20160628045112.GA3784@osiris> References: <146703807642.15496.11673601281156224299.stgit@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com List-Archive: To: Paul Moore Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com List-ID: On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:37:59AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > From: Paul Moore > > > > When executing s390 code on s390x the syscall arguments are not > > properly masked, leading to some malformed audit records. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore > > --- > > arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > The only change between v2 and the original patch is the use of > is_compat_task() instead of the #ifdef, as suggested by Heiko. Like > before, I've added this patch to the audit#next branch; I think we > have sorted all the feedback, but if any objections remain please let > me know. Thanks! Acked-by: Heiko Carstens