From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20160822150208.2b78aaf3@thinkpad-w530> References: <82b84c9c-38a4-4d17-910f-312668dbae01@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Christian =?UTF-8?B?Qm9ybnRyw6RnZXI=?= , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?UTF-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-ID: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:41:43 +0200 > > * Reuse existing functionality from memdup_user() instead of keeping > duplicate source code. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > * Return directly if this copy operation failed. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring I like that. Thanks for running that analysis software against s390 KVM code! Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand David