From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:29:26 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLJY_zYf=v_xYUEG6tgLzwvW8P+-d9GNNp8XN5bhnWvzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20171025102737.GA145851@beast>
        <20171026083842.5ca46b2f@mschwideX1>
        <CAGXu5jLJY_zYf=v_xYUEG6tgLzwvW8P+-d9GNNp8XN5bhnWvzQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20171103072926.12ef827c@mschwideX1>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >>
> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c   | 10 +++++-----
> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h   |  2 +-
> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c |  2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)  
> >
> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> > Thanks.  
> 
> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
> 
> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> 
> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
> all these conversions have landed.

These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
patches are not in -next as well. 

Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.