From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:16:50 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw Message-ID: <20171127101650.74f6e272.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1511500846-24696-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1511500846-24696-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20171124140918.GF4284@osiris> <20171124181148-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20171124165301.GH4284@osiris> <20171124190132-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20171124171834.GA2857@osiris> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Heiko Carstens , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth , Halil Pasic , Martin Schwidefsky List-ID: On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:15:14 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 11/24/2017 06:18 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > >>>>> Is there any reason to add the whole BSD 3 clause license text? I'd prefer > >>>>> if it would be just the simple new SPDX-License-Identifier above. > >> > >> I added it for consistency with other virtio headers. > > > > Well, one of the points of the SPDX tags is to avoid the countless > > duplication of license texts. Adding a license text is easy, removing it > > again later is not as easy. Therefore I would prefer to avoid the > > duplication here again. > > > > Cornelia, Christian, any opinion here? > > I would prefer to not have the full licence text and only have the SPDX string > if that is allowed by the licence. > Works for me.