From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:32:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20171207153242.0490a77f.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20171207141102.70190-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20171207141102.70190-2-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171207141102.70190-2-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:11:02 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire > up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding > the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that > has to be done in virtio_ccw itself is to re-set the > virtio revision. > > Suggested-by: Thomas Huth > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > --- > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) Less work than I had expected :) This looks complete: The only thing we do in our online function not directly triggered by registering the virtio device is setting the revision. Will apply, but would not mind some R-bs/acks.