From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio-ccw: update documentation Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:28:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20180116172818.6f35a1c0.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20180115104353.27413-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <20180115104353.27413-2-cohuck@redhat.com> <5a99b7e2-3cce-c92d-f1d8-1469a334ff6d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5a99b7e2-3cce-c92d-f1d8-1469a334ff6d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Halil Pasic Cc: bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:17:08 +0100 Halil Pasic wrote: > On 01/15/2018 11:43 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > The vfio-ccw documentation comes from the cover letter of the > > original patch submission, which shows in some parts. Give it some > > love; in particular: > > > > - Remove/rework statements that make sense in a cover letter, but not > > in regular documentation. > > - Fix some typos. > > - Describe the current limitations in more detail. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck > > The changes look sane and definitively improve on what we have > right now. Acked by me if you like. Can you please give your explicit A-b on v2? > > When we are at the limitations, the prefetch story seems to be > still missing. IMHO it's the most important limitation. Yeah, that's just a start. I'm happy to take further patches :)