linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:40:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180123154006.14fb7ce0@mschwideX1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180123145947.72bb1cd2.cohuck@redhat.com>

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:59:47 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:07:02 +0100
> Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > To be able to switch off specific CPU alternatives with kernel parameters
> > make a copy of the facility bit mask provided by STFLE and use the copy
> > for the decision to apply an alternative.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/facility.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/lowcore.h  |  3 ++-
> >  arch/s390/kernel/alternative.c   |  3 ++-
> >  arch/s390/kernel/early.c         |  3 +++
> >  arch/s390/kernel/setup.c         |  4 +++-
> >  arch/s390/kernel/smp.c           |  4 +++-
> >  6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)  
> 
> You have dropped various r-bs (including mine). Has this patch been
> changed? (Doesn't look like it.)
 
Added your and Davids r-b to patch #2, as well as your a-b to patch #4.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-23 13:07 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] s390: improve speculative execution handling v2 Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 17:07   ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-01-24  6:29     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-24  8:37       ` Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control] Dominik Brodowski
2018-01-24  9:24         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24 11:15         ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-24 12:48           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-24 19:01             ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-24 20:46               ` Alan Cox
2018-01-29 13:14                 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-29 20:12                   ` Alan Cox
2018-01-24 15:42         ` Alan Cox
2018-01-24  8:08     ` [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-23 14:40     ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2018-01-23 15:04       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 14:21   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 20:32     ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-24  6:36       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-24 11:50         ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:09   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 14:32     ` Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180123154006.14fb7ce0@mschwideX1 \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meissner@suse.de \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).