From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ursula Braun Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/smc: simplify function smc_clcsock_accept() Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:28:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20180124092817.103089-3-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180124092817.103089-1-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180124092817.103089-1-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, raspl@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-ID: Cleanup to avoid duplicate code in smc_clcsock_accept(). No functional change. Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index eccccf743b9f..05cbcd3a6f60 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -599,16 +599,9 @@ static int smc_clcsock_accept(struct smc_sock *lsmc, struct smc_sock **new_smc) rc = kernel_accept(lsmc->clcsock, &new_clcsock, 0); lock_sock(lsk); - if (rc < 0) { + if (rc < 0) lsk->sk_err = -rc; - new_sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED; - sock_set_flag(new_sk, SOCK_DEAD); - new_sk->sk_prot->unhash(new_sk); - sock_put(new_sk); - *new_smc = NULL; - goto out; - } - if (lsk->sk_state == SMC_CLOSED) { + if (rc < 0 || lsk->sk_state == SMC_CLOSED) { if (new_clcsock) sock_release(new_clcsock); new_sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED; -- 2.13.5