linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:51:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207125148.2c657e58@mschwideX1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207100726.GB31392@amd>

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:07:26 +0100
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

> On Wed 2018-02-07 08:00:11, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Add CONFIG_EXPOLINE to enable the use of the new -mindirect-branch= and
> > -mfunction_return= compiler options to create a kernel fortified against
> > the specte v2 attack.
> > 
> > With CONFIG_EXPOLINE=y all indirect branches will be issued with an
> > execute type instruction. For z10 or newer the EXRL instruction will
> > be used, for older machines the EX instruction. The typical indirect
> > call
> > 
> > 	basr	%r14,%r1
> > 
> > is replaced with a PC relative call to a new thunk
> > 
> > 	brasl	%r14,__s390x_indirect_jump_r1
> > 
> > The thunk contains the EXRL/EX instruction to the indirect branch
> > 
> > __s390x_indirect_jump_r1:
> > 	exrl	0,0f
> > 	j	.
> > 0:	br	%r1
> > 
> > The detour via the execute type instruction has a performance impact.
> > To get rid of the detour the new kernel parameter "nospectre_v2" and
> > "spectre_v2=[on,off,auto]" can be used. If the parameter is specified
> > the kernel and module code will be patched at runtime.  
> 
> This is really unfortunate naming of kernel option.
> 
> spectre_v2=off sounds like we are turning the "bug" off, but i somehow
> suspect you are turning the bug _workaround_ off.
 
Well, that is the 1:1 copy of the x86 option. Do you want to change that
one as well?

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07  7:00 [PATCH 0/6] s390: improve speculative execution handling v3 Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07  7:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07  7:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] s390: add optimized array_index_mask_nospec Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07  7:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07  7:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07 10:02   ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-07 11:49     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07  7:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] s390: run user space and KVM guests with modified branch prediction Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07  7:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07 10:07   ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-07 11:51     ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2018-02-07 12:07     ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-07 12:17       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-02-07 12:20         ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-07 17:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-07 23:44           ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-02-08  0:05             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-08  0:57             ` Kees Cook
2018-02-08 17:11               ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207125148.2c657e58@mschwideX1 \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=meissner@suse.de \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).