From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:09:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215140929.025d668e.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207114647.6220-4-david@redhat.com>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:46:44 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> We must copy both, the epoch and the epoch_idx.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index b514ee427077..d007b737cd4d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2387,6 +2387,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> preempt_disable();
> vcpu->arch.sie_block->epoch = vcpu->kvm->arch.epoch;
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->epdx = vcpu->kvm->arch.epdx;
> preempt_enable();
> mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm)) {
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 11:46 [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 13:47 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 13:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 14:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-16 9:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:13 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 20:15 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:09 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-02-16 9:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:08 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 22:43 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-08 12:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] KVM: s390: no need to inititalize kvm->arch members to 0 David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext() David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:50 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180215140929.025d668e.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).