linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext()
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:08:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215150833.56a4ba02.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207114647.6220-7-david@redhat.com>

On Wed,  7 Feb 2018 12:46:47 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Move the Multiple-epoch facility handling into it and rename it to
> kvm_s390_get_tod_clock().
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Looks correct, but I'm not sure what this buys us?

> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 0c0eed7d60a8..df452b8b4f26 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -990,8 +990,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_tod(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext(struct kvm *kvm,
> -					struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock *gtod)
> +static void kvm_s390_get_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				   struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock *gtod)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_s390_tod_clock_ext htod;
>  
> @@ -1000,10 +1000,12 @@ static void kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	get_tod_clock_ext((char *)&htod);
>  
>  	gtod->tod = htod.tod + kvm->arch.epoch;
> -	gtod->epoch_idx = htod.epoch_idx + kvm->arch.epdx;
> -
> -	if (gtod->tod < htod.tod)
> -		gtod->epoch_idx += 1;
> +	gtod->epoch_idx = 0;
> +	if (test_kvm_facility(kvm, 139)) {
> +		gtod->epoch_idx = htod.epoch_idx + kvm->arch.epdx;
> +		if (gtod->tod < htod.tod)
> +			gtod->epoch_idx += 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	preempt_enable();
>  }
> @@ -1012,13 +1014,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_tod_ext(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock gtod;
>  
> -	memset(&gtod, 0, sizeof(gtod));
> -
> -	if (test_kvm_facility(kvm, 139))
> -		kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext(kvm, &gtod);
> -	else
> -		gtod.tod = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(kvm);
> -
> +	kvm_s390_get_tod_clock(kvm, &gtod);
>  	if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, &gtod, sizeof(gtod)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-15 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 11:46 [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 13:47   ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 13:58     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 14:06       ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-16  9:45   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:13   ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 20:15     ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:42     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-16  9:50   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:08   ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:35     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 22:43       ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-08 12:15         ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] KVM: s390: no need to inititalize kvm->arch members to 0 David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:25   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext() David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:08   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-02-15 14:14     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:25         ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:50 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180215150833.56a4ba02.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).