* Re: [PATCH] s390: Replace IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_*)
[not found] <20180217231029.32111-1-rosca.eugeniu@gmail.com>
@ 2018-02-19 6:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2018-02-19 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-s390
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:10:29 +0100
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
>
> I've accidentally stumbled upon the IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) lines, which
> obviously always evaluate to false. Fix this.
>
> Fixes: f19fbd5ed642 ("s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches")
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
> index 69d7fcf48158..9aff72d3abda 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
>
> -int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_OFF);
> -int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_FULL);
> +int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_OFF);
> +int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_FULL);
>
> static int __init nospectre_v2_setup_early(char *str)
> {
Applied, thank you!
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread