linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:16:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226121628.5e832adf@ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226012100.GA6019@linaro.org>

Hi Dave
Hi AKASHI

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:21:02 +0900
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:

> > 
> > Arch code need arch maintainer to review, maybe either of you can send
> > the common part first before the arch code, eg. AKASHI can split the common
> >  cleanup patches and post them as a separate series, after these prep
> > series are reviewed then other patches can be refreshed based on it.
> > 
> > Seems in AKASHI's series, only patch 2, 3 ,4 ,5 is needed if split out
> > as a common change series.  
> 
> Yeah, all of those are touching kernel/kexec_file.c and in turn
> they can conflict if being applied with 390 patches, but none of changes
> that I made on kexec_file.c are overlapped with Phillips', I suppose
> that merging these two patch sets is rather straightforward.
> 
> @Phillips: I hope that your patch#14 and #17 be aligned with my patch#3
> as it is factoring out arch_kexec_{image_probe, image_load, verify_sig}()
> and arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup().

Splitting the common code patches from the series is totally fine with me.

On Friday I managed to get my code working with AKASHI's patches. After setting
ARCH_HAS_PURGATORY and cleaning up the kexec_* functions it worked basically out
of the box. However there is one problem with older compilers on s390. Please
see my comment on patch #3 for details.

Thanks
Philipp

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 10:07 [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390 Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/17] kexec_file: Silence compile warnings Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/17] kexec_file: Remove checks in kexec_purgatory_load Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/17] kexec_file: Make purgatory_info->ehdr const Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/17] kexec_file: Search symbols in read-only kexec_purgatory Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] kexec_file: Use read-only sections in arch_kexec_apply_relocations* Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] kexec_file: Split up __kexec_load_puragory Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/17] kexec_file: Simplify kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs 1 Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/17] kexec_file: Simplify kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs 2 Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/17] kexec_file: Remove mis-use of sh_offset field Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/17] kexec_file: Allow archs to set purgatory load address Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 11/17] kexec_file: Move purgatories sha256 to common code Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 12/17] s390/kexec_file: Prepare setup.h for kexec_file_load Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 13/17] s390/kexec_file: Add purgatory Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 14/17] s390/kexec_file: Add kexec_file_load system call Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:56   ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-12 11:29     ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 15/17] s390/kexec_file: Add image loader Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 16/17] s390/kexec_file: Add crash support to " Philipp Rudo
2018-02-12 10:07 ` [PATCH 17/17] s390/kexec_file: Add ELF loader Philipp Rudo
2018-02-14  7:35 ` [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390 Dave Young
2018-02-14  9:54   ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-15  5:08     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  8:34     ` Dave Young
2018-02-23 10:01       ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-24  1:59         ` Dave Young
2018-02-26  1:21           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-26 11:16             ` Philipp Rudo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180226121628.5e832adf@ThinkPad \
    --to=prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).