From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:05:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] vfio: ccw: Merge BUSY and BOXED states
Message-Id: <20181020190556.474756cd.cohuck@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <2aa1b730-d3f0-4b10-ff7b-436ad838b300@linux.ibm.com>
References: <2aa1b730-d3f0-4b10-ff7b-436ad838b300@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:49:47 -0400
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 10/18/2018 09:12 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:

> > OK, so I can pick patch 2 (if you're happy with that) and we can
> > discuss this one later.  
> 
> Per Pierre's response, I don't share Halil's concern here.  But I think 
> the state stuff gets better with the other patches in the RFC series. 
> So if patch 1 waits until we get a chance to look at its cousins, I'm 
> fine with that too.  (I haven't looked at them myself, I just remember 
> an earlier series and thinking it looked promising.  I still intend to 
> look at them as time permits.)

Yes, looking at this in conjunction with the other patches makes sense.