From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:13:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20190211171354.40be0856.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20190130132212.7376-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <20190206150016.6fdfaf8f.cohuck@redhat.com> <1981d9bc-e950-62ef-d2d2-66a17771c8f4@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1981d9bc-e950-62ef-d2d2-66a17771c8f4@linux.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel2=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" List-Archive: List-Post: To: Eric Farman Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , Pierre Morel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Farhan Ali , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org List-ID: On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:19:58 -0500 Eric Farman wrote: > On 02/06/2019 09:00 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:22:06 +0100 > > Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > >> [This is the Linux kernel part, git tree is available at > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw.git vfio-ccw-eagain-caps-v3 > > > > I've pushed out the changes I've made so far (patch 1) to > > vfio-ccw-eagain-caps-v3.5. I'll wait a bit for more comments before > > sending a new version. > > > > Thanks for that branch... For patch 1 in v3.5: > > Reviewed-by: Eric Farman Thanks! > > >> > >> The companion QEMU patches are available at > >> https://github.com/cohuck/qemu vfio-ccw-caps > >> This is the previously posted v2 version, which should continue to work.] > > > > I would not mind if somebody looked at those as well :) > > Not precluding anyone else from doing so :) ... I'd planned on looking > at them as I get into the meat of patches 4-6 on the kernel side, where > the overlap occurs. I'm getting close. :) Cool :) I'll wait a bit more before resending, then. (I'll probably rebase the QEMU side as well when I do resend.) > > FWIW, I've been running with both series for the last week or two, along > with some host kernel traces to prove things got executed the way I > thought, and it's seemed to be working well. So that makes me > optimistic for the later patches. That's good news, thanks for testing. Do you have a special test load that you run in the guest that you can share?