From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] cpu/speculation: Add 'cpu_spec_mitigations=' cmdline options Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:30:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20190410083028.GA26580@zn.tnic> References: <20190405131211.GE23348@zn.tnic> <20190405142048.burthk2jnpcvi2om@treble> <20190405152059.GG23348@zn.tnic> <20190405160136.GI23348@zn.tnic> <20190405161852.nmpk22omgiety4df@treble> <87sguqwgu7.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sguqwgu7.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Kosina , Waiman Long , Andrea Arcangeli , Jon Masters , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.orglin List-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:48:48PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > What about when we have a mitigation for a non-speculation related bug :) Like that is *ever* going to happen... :-P -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.