From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 16:04:48 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] virtio/s390: use vring_create_virtqueue Message-ID: <20190503160421-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20190426183245.37939-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20190426183245.37939-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20190503111724.70c6ec37.cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190503111724.70c6ec37.cohuck@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Halil Pasic , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Sebastian Ott , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Huth , Christian Borntraeger , Viktor Mihajlovski , Vasily Gorbik , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Farhan Ali , Eric Farman List-ID: On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 11:17:24AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:36 +0200 > Halil Pasic wrote: > > > The commit 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add improved queue allocation API") > > establishes a new way of allocating virtqueues (as a part of the effort > > that taught DMA to virtio rings). > > > > In the future we will want virtio-ccw to use the DMA API as well. > > > > Let us switch from the legacy method of allocating virtqueues to > > vring_create_virtqueue() as the first step into that direction. > > > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic > > --- > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 30 +++++++++++------------------- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck > > I'd vote for merging this patch right away for 5.2. So which tree is this going through? mine? -- MST