From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL where it has no effect Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:19:21 +0300 Message-ID: <20190516051921.GC21366@rapoport-lnx> References: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andrew, Can this go via the -mm tree? On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:56:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi, > > For several architectures the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL has no real effect > because the dependencies for the memory model are always evaluated to a > single value. > > Remove the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL from the Kconfigs for these > architectures. > > Mike Rapoport (3): > arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > s390: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > sparc: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 --- > arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 --- > arch/sparc/Kconfig | 3 --- > 3 files changed, 9 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.