From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:51:58 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] iommu/amd: Convert the AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api Message-ID: <20190603105158.GL12745@8bytes.org> References: <20190506185207.31069-1-tmurphy@arista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190506185207.31069-1-tmurphy@arista.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tom Murphy Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, murphyt7@tcd.ie, Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Marek Szyprowski , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , David Woodhouse , Andy Gross , David Brown , Matthias Brugger , Rob Clark , Heiko Stuebner , Gerald Schaefer , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Hi Tom, On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 07:52:02PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote: > Convert the AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api. Remove the iova > handling and reserve region code from the AMD iommu driver. Thank you for your work on this! I appreciate that much, but I am not sure we are ready to make that move for the AMD and Intel IOMMU drivers yet. My main concern right now is that these changes will add a per-page table lock into the fast-path for dma-mapping operations. There has been much work in the past to remove all locking from these code-paths and make it scalable on x86. The dma-ops implementations in the x86 IOMMU drivers have the benefit that they can call their page-table manipulation functions directly and without locks, because they can make the necessary assumptions. The IOMMU-API mapping/unmapping path can't make these assumptions because it is also used for non-DMA-API use-cases. So before we can move the AMD and Intel drivers to the generic DMA-API implementation we need to solve this problem to not introduce new scalability regressions. Regards, Joerg