From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35522 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725840AbfGLHNc (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 03:13:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:13:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files Message-ID: <20190712071328.GA22889@lst.de> References: <20190712053631.9814-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190712053631.9814-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190712053631.9814-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: x86@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Alexey Dobriyan , Halil Pasic , Mike Anderson , Ram Pai Honestly I think this code should go away without any replacement. There is no reason why we should have a special debug printk just for one specific reason why there is a requirement for a large DMA mask.