From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:59464 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726152AbfHINw2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:52:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 06:52:02 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [RFC V2 0/1] mm/debug: Add tests for architecture exported page table helpers Message-ID: <20190809135202.GN5482@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1565335998-22553-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20190809101632.GM5482@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Rapoport , Jason Gunthorpe , Dan Williams , Peter Zijlstra , Michal Hocko , Mark Rutland , Mark Brown , Steven Price , Ard Biesheuvel , Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Tetsuo Handa , Sri Krishna chowdary , Dave Hansen , Russell King - ARM Linux , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , "David S. Miller" , Vineet Gupta , James Hogan , Paul Burton , Ralf Baechle , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 04:05:07PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 08/09/2019 03:46 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:03:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> Should alloc_gigantic_page() be made available as an interface for general > >> use in the kernel. The test module here uses very similar implementation from > >> HugeTLB to allocate a PUD aligned memory block. Similar for mm_alloc() which > >> needs to be exported through a header. > > > > Why are you allocating memory at all instead of just using some > > known-to-exist PFNs like I suggested? > > We needed PFN to be PUD aligned for pfn_pud() and PMD aligned for mk_pmd(). > Now walking the kernel page table for a known symbol like kernel_init() I didn't say to walk the kernel page table. I said to call virt_to_pfn() for a known symbol like kernel_init(). > as you had suggested earlier we might encounter page table page entries at PMD > and PUD which might not be PMD or PUD aligned respectively. It seemed to me > that alignment requirement is applicable only for mk_pmd() and pfn_pud() > which create large mappings at those levels but that requirement does not > exist for page table pages pointing to next level. Is not that correct ? Or > I am missing something here ? Just clear the bottom bits off the PFN until you get a PMD or PUD aligned PFN. It's really not hard.