From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33374 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726637AbfH2Ltz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:49:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:49:47 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Test for bad access register at the start of S390_MEM_OP Message-ID: <20190829134947.167bae1d.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190829105356.27805-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20190829131845.5a72231a.cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Huth Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:47:59 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 29/08/2019 13.18, Cornelia Huck wrote: > [...] > > > > Btw: should Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt spell out the valid range > > for ar explicitly? > > > > That certainly would not hurt. Care to send a patch, or shall I assemble > one? > > Thomas Will do.