From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43192 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725775AbfIMHUk (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 03:20:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:30 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not leak kernel stack data in the KVM_S390_INTERRUPT ioctl Message-ID: <20190913092030.373a9254.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <239c8d0f-40fb-264a-bc10-445931a3cd9a@redhat.com> References: <20190912090050.20295-1-thuth@redhat.com> <6905df78-95f0-3d6d-aaae-910cd2d7a232@redhat.com> <253e67f6-0a41-13e8-4ca2-c651d5fcdb69@redhat.com> <239c8d0f-40fb-264a-bc10-445931a3cd9a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Huth Cc: Christian Borntraeger , David Hildenbrand , Janosch Frank , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:23:38 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > Hmm, we already talked about deprecating support for pre-3.15 kernel > stuff in the past (see > https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/2.12#Future_incompatible_changes for > example), Btw: did we ever do that? I don't quite recall what code we were talking about...