From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:8746 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389902AbfJ2QSB (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:18:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9TFqitd038945 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:18:00 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vxp7rqp7y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:18:00 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:17:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:17:51 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model References: <20191029143904.24051-1-mbenes@suse.cz> <20191029143904.24051-4-mbenes@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191029143904.24051-4-mbenes@suse.cz> Message-Id: <20191029161751.GH5646@osiris> Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Miroslav Benes Cc: gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, nstange@suse.de, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Hi Miroslav, > +bool unwind_next_frame_reliable(struct unwind_state *state) > +{ ... > +} > + > void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long sp, > bool unwind_reliable) Did you send the wrong version of your patch series? This patch does not integrate your new function into the existing one. Also the new parameter you added with the second patch isn't used at all.